Loading ...
Creative

cpanel


User1


user2


Banner
Advertisement
Ten Reasons for Rejecting Norton-Davis Bill
(reprint from the DC Statehood Green party)
Ten reasons why D.C. residents should reject the Norton-Davis bill for a voting seat in the House and support D.C. statehood instead... THE DC STATEHOOD GREEN PARTY
http://www.dcstatehoodgreen.org

For immediate release:
Monday, June 5, 2006

Contact:
Scott McLarty, DC Statehood Green Party Media
Coordinator, 202-518-5624, This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it


• Statehood Greens warn that H.R. 5388 will take
pressure off of Congress to provide D.C. residents
with real democracy, derail progress towards
statehood, and ultimately place another Republican in
Congress.

• The Norton-Davis bill provides for second-class
citizenship in a second-class state; Statehood Greens
urge D.C. residents to demand their full
constitutional rights and self-determination.


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- DC Statehood Green Party leaders
urged District of Columbia residents to reject the
Norton-Davis bill granting D.C. a single voting seat
in the U.S. House of Representatives, and to demand
statehood instead.

The 'D.C. Fair and Equal House Voting Rights Act'
(H.R. 5388), sponsored by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton
(D-D.C.), Rep. Tom Davis (D-Va.), and two dozen other
Congressmembers, passed in the Committee on Government
Reform on May 18.

"Don't be fooled -- the Norton-Davis bill is a
symbolic piece of legislation dressed up to look like
democracy," said Gail Dixon, a Statehood Green,
longtime statehood activist, and former elected member
of the D.C School Board.  "We call on Congress to
grant us real democracy -- self-governance in the form
of statehood.  Democracy for D.C., with its African
American majority population, is one of the last major
legal civil rights hurdles."

The DC Statehood Green Party is the result of a merger
in 1999 between the DC Green Party and the DC
Statehood Party, which was founded in 1970 as part of
the Civil Rights Movement and whose banner demand has
been statehood for the District.

Statehood Greens offered ten major reasons to reject
the Norton-Davis bill and pursue statehood for the
District:

(1) The Norton-Davis bill grants full constitutional
rights to a single District resident -- Eleanor Holmes
Norton
.

"Imagine if the outcome of the Montgomery bus boycott
were that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. alone was given the
right to sit in front of the bus, while all other
black citizens of Montgomery still had to sit in the
back.  In effect, that's what the Norton-Davis bill
would enact," said Ms. Dixon.

(2) The Norton-Davis bill, which gives D.C. a single
voting seat in the House, still leaves D.C. residents
with less congressional representation than all other
Americans, who get to elect two Senators as well as a
Representative.  When D.C. wins statehood, it will
also gain two Senators and a Representative.

(3) Representation in a national legislature is not
democracy.

"Throughout history, colonies have enjoyed voting
seats in the legislatures of nations that conquered
them, even while they suffered exploitation and
suppression," said Adam Eidinger, former candidate for
D.C.'s unpaid U.S. Representative position.  "Our own
Founding Fathers and Mothers fought for democracy and
independence, not 'voting rights.'  Patrick Henry
never said 'Give me a seat in Parliament or give me
death.'  The only real democracy is self-governance
for the people of D.C. -- statehood -- not this fake
democracy Del. Norton and others are peddling."

(4) The voting seat afforded by the Norton Davis bill
will not block Congress from imposing its will and
veto power on D.C.  In 1998, Congress overturned a
ballot measure that passed with a 69% majority in D.C.
(Initiative 59 for medical marijuana).  Congress has
also forced D.C. to adopt 'zero tolerance' laws;
ordered Mayor Williams (through the appointed
Financial Control Board) to dismantle D.C. General
Hospital, the District's only full-service public
health facility, imposed a charter school system; and
outlawed needle exchange to prevent HIV transmission.
Members of Congress who represent suburban districts
in Virginia and Maryland have exploited D.C. for the
benefit of their constituents, prohibiting D.C. from
taxing commuters (every other city in the U.S. relies
on commuter taxes) and pushing for a new convention
center in 1999 to be paid for by a D.C. business
surtax for the profit of suburban businesses.
Congress members have sought to overturn local gun
control laws, enact the death penalty, impose a school
voucher program, and prohibit benefits for same-sex
couples.

"Only full self-government -- statehood -- will stop
Congress from forcing unwanted laws, policies, and
budgets on DC and overturning laws and policies
enacted by District voters and City Council," said
said Anne Anderson, a long-time D.C. statehood
activist.  "The Norton-Davis bill does nearly nothing
to increase the political power of D.C. citizens,
because the new voting seat would be only one of 437,
and is offset by the addition of a Republican voting
seat in Utah under the bipartisan deal made to win
support for H.R. 5388."

(5) The lack of statehood has made D.C. residents
second-class U.S. citizens, denying them rights that
all other U.S. citizens enjoy -- contrary to the 14th
Amendment to the Constitution, which ensures equal
protection under the law.

"This is why, ever since thousands of African
Americans moved to D.C. in the 1950s to take federal
jobs but had no control over local laws, one of the
nicknames of the District has been 'The Last
Plantation,'" said T.E. Smith, Ward 8 delegate to the
Statehood Green Party's steering committee and a
Vietnam War veteran.  "The Norton-Davis bill will not
change our colonial status.  Ironically, President
Bush is sending young men and women from D.C. to face
injury and death fighting for the democratic rights of
Iraqis -- rights they don't enjoy at home."

(6) If the Norton-Davis bill passes, Congress will
still hold the power to revoke D.C.'s lone voting seat
and repeal D.C.'s limited democratic powers.  Under
statehood, Congress would not have the power to revoke
D.C. democracy.  Except for the Southern states after
they rebelled in the Civil War, Congress has never
rescinded any state's right to govern itself.

(7) The Norton-Davis bill will set back the movement
for full constitutional rights for District residents
for decades, because Congress will consider democracy
for D.C. a fait accompli.

"When the Democratic Party, at Ms. Norton's
encouragement, removed the goal of D.C. statehood from
the party's platform in 2004 it left only one major
party in D.C. that supports statehood -- the DC
Statehood Green Party," said Rick Tingling-Clemmons,
Ward 7 representative to the party's Steering
Committee.

(8) Since the decisions of D.C. elected officials are
all subject to Congressional approval and veto power,
and the elected Representative would be the District's
sole voting representative in Congress, the bill will
give this representative sole and discretionary
'gatekeeper' power over all D.C. laws, policies, and
budgets -- contrary to the principle of
self-determination, which is the basis of democracy.

"Leverage over all D.C. political agenda will be
invested in a one individual -- Ms. Norton.  This is
the exact opposite of democracy," said Jay Marx, DC
Statehood Green Party steering committee member and
former candidate for City Council Ward 2 seat.

(9) If the bill passes, it's quite possible that the
Supreme Court will overturn it, since the U.S.
Constitution grants voting representation in Congress
solely to states.  The Supreme Court will not overturn
an Act of Congress that allows D.C. to become a state.

"This might well be the Republican strategy -- make a
deal with Democrats to add a new Democratic D.C. seat
and a new Republican Utah seat.  Then, after the
passage of the Norton-Davis bill, someone will file a
suit to block Ms. Norton from taking her seat in the
House, on constitutional grounds.  If the Supreme
Court acts on its alleged pro-Republican bias, D.C.
will lose its seat while the Republicans get to keep
their Utah seat.  Anyone who believes that Republicans
aren't capable of such a plan have forgotten how the
Republican Party redistricted Texas, as well as the
election irregularities in Florida in 2000 and in Ohio
and other states in 2004," said John Gloster, a
long-time party member.

(10) If a court overturns the bill and requires a
constitutional amendment, then, procedurally, full
democracy will be easier to achieve than mere voting
rights in Congress, since a vote for statehood would
not require the 2/3 majority necessary to pass
constitutional amendment.  In 1846, an Act of Congress
removed Alexandria and parts of Arlington from the
District and gave it to the state of Virginia.  This
precedent proves that Congress, through legislation
requiring a simple majority, can change the District's
borders and reduce the constitutionally mandated
federal enclave to include only the federal properties
(White House, Capitol, Mall, etc.), thus freeing the
rest of D.C. to choose statehood by a plebescite vote.


MORE INFORMATION

The DC Statehood Green Party
http://www.dcstatehoodgreen.org

Stand Up! for Democracy in D.C. Coalition
http://www.standupfordemocracy.org

The D.C. Statehood Papers: Writings on D.C. Statehood
& self-government by Sam Smith
http://prorev.com/dcsthdintro.htm

Twenty D.C. Citizens Lawsuit: The case for full
democracy and equality
http://www.dccitizensfordemocracy.org

The D.C. Fair and Equal House Voting Rights Act (H.R.
5388)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d109:40:./temp/~bd0PLF::|/bss/d109query.html|
 
< Prev   Next >






Donate to Stand Up! with PayPal. We're working hard for democracy!

DC Mayor Dons Free DC Ball Cap

fenty-brown-aide.JPGIt would seem our hard-charging shadow senator, Michael Brown, has gotten Mayor Adrian Fenty to swap his fedora for a Free DC ballcap. Also pictured here is Hellen Matarazzo. Way to go, Mike! Smile

Photo by Lateef Mangum

What Do You Think?

Which "DC democracy" do you favor?